If you have read any of my blog posts in the past, you will be aware of how great I think social media is. And this blog post is no exception. In this post I will be discussing the relationship between social media and cultural heritage. And, like most of my social media conclusions, this one is also positive.
Cultural institutions face many challenges and threats in today’s society. They face competition with other institutions, challenges with numbers, and issues with the advancement of digital media. Institutions have to keep up to date with digital media in order to stay relevant. This includes updating digital archives, having an effective and interactive website, and including interactive elements into the physical establishment. Keeping up with digital media also includes utilising social media.

There are many reasons why using social media is beneficial for cultural institutions. I will be pointing out a few of these reasons and unpacking them.
Firstly, a major benefit is for marketing and communication purposes. Social media provides a new way for cultural institutions to communicate and connect with their audience. The use of social media for marketing purposes for cultural institutions is not the same as a marketing campaign for commercial organisations. Cultural institutions, such as museums and galleries, are public institutions with different structures and functions, therefore the use of social media for marketing purposes is not really used for profit increase or creating and raising brand awareness (Spiliopoulou et al. 2014, pg. 288). Social media is used to increase accessibility for their various audiences. These institutions want to make sure that everyone has access to their collections and are able to be a part of the learning experience they have to offer.
By using social media, institutions are able to reach a wider audience, providing much more accessibility that is not limited to physical location or current situations. They can connect to their audience in a different way, while also showcasing their collections and any events or news at the institution. Not only that, but social media can target a younger audience, providing newer generations the chance to learn and engage in cultural conversations and topics.
Another positive and important aspect of social media and cultural institutions, is the growth and development of public engagement. Social media allows for various types of engagement with cultural institutions and their collections. Cultural institutions are meant to act as forums for the negotiation of knowledge (Laws 2015, pg. 3). And this is easier to achieve with the use of social media. Social media allows institutions to not only share information and collections online, but it also allows for new ways of engagement and communication. People can interact and engage with content posted by institutions on their social media pages. This includes commenting, sharing, liking, and so forth. Social media creates a many-to-many form of communication, instead of a one-to-one or one-to-many method (Spiliopoulou et al. 2014, pg. 287). This “encourages interactivity among users and puts aside the object-oriented ideology of museums promoting a visitor-centred approach” (Spiliopoulou et al. 2014, pg. 287). Not only does social media allow for communication among institutions and their audience, but it also allows for higher engagement with people all over the world. People are not limited by their physical location in order to engage and view an institution’s collection. Social media platforms allow for the sharing and promoting of items and objects in an institution’s possession, and enables viewing from all over the world. This fits in with the idea that cultural institutions act as public spaces that encourages learning and conversation with everyone, not just an exclusive group of people.

As with anything, the use of social media by cultural institutions is not straightforward and comes with challenges and issues. There are varying opinions on the use of social media and cultural heritage. One issue that is brought forward is the issue of power and authority. With social media allowing public engagement, there becomes an issue of ‘authority’ being subverted (Laws 2015, pg. 8). Initially many organisations were reluctant and unsure of adopting social media practices. This is because of that issue of authority and expertise. It was a one-way form of communication, where the expert would give their knowledge and opinion to visitors. However, the rise of social media and digital media requires a two-way form of communication where both sides give and take. And with the Internet giving access to a huge array of information, institutions can often get washed away with the rest of the Internet.

However, it is not all doom and gloom, with many institutions rising to the challenge. There is still a sense of authority, with curators, experts, and more, providing their knowledge and acting as facilitators of conversation surrounding knowledge and ideas. Through social media, institutions can enable a flow of communication, not just with their followers, but also among followers. As mentioned before, social media platforms provide a space where people can discuss objects and history and art, and so forth. And institutions can still show their authority by monitoring and participating in the conversation.

I have made a video that gives three different examples of cultural institutions that have used social media in a successful way. Social media includes blogs, interactive sites, and social networking sites or SNS. Cultural institutions can use social media for a variety of reasons, including marketing and communication and public engagement and education. Social media can be used by cultural institutions to connect with their audiences in new and closer ways. By using social media, cultural institutions have a new opportunity to share their knowledge and collections with more people in new and developed ways. The aims of cultural institutions such as museums and galleries is to share history, objects, art, and more, with the world and create a conversation and to teach people. As you will see in my three examples, all their aims or mission statements are based on that idea of conservation, curation, and the encouragement of learning and education and thinking about our history as people.
Bibliography:
Drotner, K & Schrøder, KC 2013, Museum communication and social media: the connected museum, Routledge, New York, <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy-f.deakin.edu.au/lib/deakin/detail.action?docID=1683228>.
Ellis, M 2017, 5 great examples of social media campaigns from the cultural sector, Eventbrite Blog, viewed 27 January 2020, <https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/blog/social-media-campaigns-cultural-ds00/>.
Giridharadas, A 2014, ‘Museums see different virtues in virtual worlds’, The New York Times, 7 August, viewed 29 January 20220, <https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/08/arts/design/museums-see-different-virtues-in-virtual-worlds.html>.
Gonzalez, R 2017, ‘Keep the conversation going: how museums use social media to engage the public’, The Museum Scholar, vol. 1, no. 1, viewed 28 January 2020, <http://articles.themuseumscholar.org/vol1no1gonzalez>.
Laws, A 2015, Museum websites and social media: issues of participation, sustainability, trust, and diversity, Berghahn Books, New York, <https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy-f.deakin.edu.au/lib/deakin/detail.action?docID=4007275>.
National Gallery of Australia 2020, About us: vision + policies, viewed 29 January 2020, <https://nga.gov.au/aboutus/admin.cfm>.
Spiliopoulou, AY, Mahony, S, Routsis, V & Kamposiori, C 2014, ‘Cultural institutions in the digital age: British Museum’s use of Facebook insights’, Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 286-303, viewed 28 January 2020, <https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1549710/1/Spiliopoulou_Mahony_Routsis_Kamporiori.pdf>.
The British Museum 2020, About us, viewed 29 January 2020, <https://www.britishmuseum.org/about-us>.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2019, Met welcomes nearly 7.4 million visitors in 2018, viewed 29 January 2020, <https://www.metmuseum.org/press/news/2019/2018-calendar-year-attendance>.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2020, About The Met, viewed 29 January 2020, <https://www.metmuseum.org/about-the-met>.
Vassiliadis, CA & Belenioti, Z 2015, ‘Museums & cultural heritage via social media: an integrated literature review’, Tourismos: An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 97-132, viewed 27 January 2020, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314465229_Museums_Cultural_Heritage_via_Social_Media_An_Integrated_Literature_Review?enrichId=rgreq-0992e90db061514d5b508253b12bbd8a-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzMxNDQ2NTIyOTtBUzo2NzI4NDMwMDQxNDU2NjVAMTUzNzQyOTY4MTEyNw%3D%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf>.



























